🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a flawed assessment of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an grave risk to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Economic Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% increase for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Today, about 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Problem

The growing economic gap is driven by stronger productivity growth in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at over $10bn, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity prompts a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these challenges, there are reasons for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the necessity of major reforms.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable far greater levels of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses significant strengths: skilled human capital, excellent education systems, and world-class labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating next-generation tech, it can still dramatically boost productivity by implementing and tailoring innovations from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a critical moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.